<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Powerpoint custom animation experiment &#8211; check out the animation for yourself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/design/powerpoint-custom-animation-experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/design/powerpoint-custom-animation-experiment/</link>
	<description>Presentation tips from Olivia Mitchell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:50:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivia Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/design/powerpoint-custom-animation-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-2374</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivia Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 06:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingaboutpresenting.com/?p=3152#comment-2374</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ellen, for your thoughts - and adding to all the value in the comments of this post. Great ideas on other ways the animations could have been done. Olivia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ellen, for your thoughts &#8211; and adding to all the value in the comments of this post. Great ideas on other ways the animations could have been done. Olivia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/design/powerpoint-custom-animation-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-2372</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingaboutpresenting.com/?p=3152#comment-2372</guid>
		<description>Interesting post and comments. Great work, Olivia! Like at least one other commenter, I felt antsy during the animated version and annoyed at having to wait for what came next. This definitely interfered with listening to the speaker. I think having the whole text on the slide allows students to see the wholeness and make connections better. On the other hand, they don&#039;t listen very much to the speaker. I&#039;d be interested to know if students would do better if there was less talking or, on the other hand, less text. Both at once don&#039;t seem to work very well. Richard E. Mayer&#039;s Redundancy Principle states that &quot;Students learn better from animation and narration than from animation, narration, and on-screen text.&quot; Note that his animation was showing a process like how lightning works -- very different from the animation used here which didn&#039;t add to the conceptual meaning at all.

There are some in-between techniques which might also be good to test, such as showing all the text but in a lighter color and &quot;undimming&quot; it and a similar idea of displaying all the text at once in a dark color but changing its color slightly as you focus on a point (I have tips of these techniques on my site.) By now, we&#039;ve come up with enough additional research ideas for the rest of the authors&#039; careers!

One more point I&#039;d like to make is that how much people learn isn&#039;t always the main goal. In a sales presentation, for example, the goal is how much people buy, and that might or might not vary along with how much people learn. Academic research isn&#039;t always fully applicable in the business world. Something more to test!
Ellen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post and comments. Great work, Olivia! Like at least one other commenter, I felt antsy during the animated version and annoyed at having to wait for what came next. This definitely interfered with listening to the speaker. I think having the whole text on the slide allows students to see the wholeness and make connections better. On the other hand, they don&#8217;t listen very much to the speaker. I&#8217;d be interested to know if students would do better if there was less talking or, on the other hand, less text. Both at once don&#8217;t seem to work very well. Richard E. Mayer&#8217;s Redundancy Principle states that &#8220;Students learn better from animation and narration than from animation, narration, and on-screen text.&#8221; Note that his animation was showing a process like how lightning works &#8212; very different from the animation used here which didn&#8217;t add to the conceptual meaning at all.</p>
<p>There are some in-between techniques which might also be good to test, such as showing all the text but in a lighter color and &#8220;undimming&#8221; it and a similar idea of displaying all the text at once in a dark color but changing its color slightly as you focus on a point (I have tips of these techniques on my site.) By now, we&#8217;ve come up with enough additional research ideas for the rest of the authors&#8217; careers!</p>
<p>One more point I&#8217;d like to make is that how much people learn isn&#8217;t always the main goal. In a sales presentation, for example, the goal is how much people buy, and that might or might not vary along with how much people learn. Academic research isn&#8217;t always fully applicable in the business world. Something more to test!<br />
Ellen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivia Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/design/powerpoint-custom-animation-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-2215</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivia Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingaboutpresenting.com/?p=3152#comment-2215</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting point - would be useful to design research to test this. And I think it&#039;s definitely useful to design and present slides in such a way that the audience does have to work to understand - rather than just be a passive consumer. Olivia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting point &#8211; would be useful to design research to test this. And I think it&#8217;s definitely useful to design and present slides in such a way that the audience does have to work to understand &#8211; rather than just be a passive consumer. Olivia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivia Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/design/powerpoint-custom-animation-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivia Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingaboutpresenting.com/?p=3152#comment-2213</guid>
		<description>Hi Jessica
I think that your explanation makes a lot of sense. The main thing we ought to do is stay silent during an animation. Olivia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jessica<br />
I think that your explanation makes a lot of sense. The main thing we ought to do is stay silent during an animation. Olivia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Enders</title>
		<link>http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/design/powerpoint-custom-animation-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-2203</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Enders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingaboutpresenting.com/?p=3152#comment-2203</guid>
		<description>Hi Olivia

Thanks for your consistently excellent posts.

I&#039;m finding it interesting to watch people&#039;s reaction to this research, which actually seems to make a lot of sense to me. Let me explain.

We humans are very good at detecting changes, especially movement, in our visual field. As I understand it the theory is that this skill helped us spot tigers in the jungle way back when. In modern times, it&#039;s why a television that&#039;s on in a bar so easily distracts us from our converation with our date.

When we notice such movement, it seems natural that we&#039;re then inclined to process it, to work out what it is we are looking at. In the digital certificate example in the screencast above, it certainly took me a good few seconds to work out what this thing was that was moving into the screen. 

Because we are physically unable to do two tasks simultaneously*, we simply cannot listen to the narration and unpick the animation at the same time. Hence this learning opportunity is compromised. 

I would suggest that for the best outcome, any time something new is brought onto the screen, the viewer is given time to see and uncode it, without any other information being directed at their senses (e.g. verbally).

Thanks again,
Jessica

* While I don&#039;t have a reference for this at hand, I am fairly confident that I have seen research from psychology that verifies that at best we can switch very quickly between two tasks, but cannot do them at /exactly/ the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Olivia</p>
<p>Thanks for your consistently excellent posts.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m finding it interesting to watch people&#8217;s reaction to this research, which actually seems to make a lot of sense to me. Let me explain.</p>
<p>We humans are very good at detecting changes, especially movement, in our visual field. As I understand it the theory is that this skill helped us spot tigers in the jungle way back when. In modern times, it&#8217;s why a television that&#8217;s on in a bar so easily distracts us from our converation with our date.</p>
<p>When we notice such movement, it seems natural that we&#8217;re then inclined to process it, to work out what it is we are looking at. In the digital certificate example in the screencast above, it certainly took me a good few seconds to work out what this thing was that was moving into the screen. </p>
<p>Because we are physically unable to do two tasks simultaneously*, we simply cannot listen to the narration and unpick the animation at the same time. Hence this learning opportunity is compromised. </p>
<p>I would suggest that for the best outcome, any time something new is brought onto the screen, the viewer is given time to see and uncode it, without any other information being directed at their senses (e.g. verbally).</p>
<p>Thanks again,<br />
Jessica</p>
<p>* While I don&#8217;t have a reference for this at hand, I am fairly confident that I have seen research from psychology that verifies that at best we can switch very quickly between two tasks, but cannot do them at /exactly/ the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InsightsWorks</title>
		<link>http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/design/powerpoint-custom-animation-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-2184</link>
		<dc:creator>InsightsWorks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingaboutpresenting.com/?p=3152#comment-2184</guid>
		<description>I also wonder if the listener becomes more passive when the slides are animated. In the static slides, I found myself mentally engaged trying to understand what the speaker was saying and trying to paint a mental picture in my head.

For the animated slides, I found myself disengaging, waiting for the slide to &quot;do something&quot; that made it all make sense. Like watching TV rather than reading a book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also wonder if the listener becomes more passive when the slides are animated. In the static slides, I found myself mentally engaged trying to understand what the speaker was saying and trying to paint a mental picture in my head.</p>
<p>For the animated slides, I found myself disengaging, waiting for the slide to &#8220;do something&#8221; that made it all make sense. Like watching TV rather than reading a book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Presenter Non Grata: are custom slide animations the new PowerPoint? &#171; Finite Attention Span</title>
		<link>http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/design/powerpoint-custom-animation-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-1926</link>
		<dc:creator>Presenter Non Grata: are custom slide animations the new PowerPoint? &#171; Finite Attention Span</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingaboutpresenting.com/?p=3152#comment-1926</guid>
		<description>[...] but Olivia Mitchell did some seriously high-quality digging and managed to acquire from the authors some samples of the materials used, and basic figures showing that students&#8217; correct answers in the static condition rose from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but Olivia Mitchell did some seriously high-quality digging and managed to acquire from the authors some samples of the materials used, and basic figures showing that students&#8217; correct answers in the static condition rose from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivia Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/design/powerpoint-custom-animation-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-1920</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivia Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingaboutpresenting.com/?p=3152#comment-1920</guid>
		<description>Thanks Todd for that analysis. I agree that there&#039;s definitely an issue of too much text, which is a major reason why this research won&#039;t immediately have me changing my approach to animation. Olivia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Todd for that analysis. I agree that there&#8217;s definitely an issue of too much text, which is a major reason why this research won&#8217;t immediately have me changing my approach to animation. Olivia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivia Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/design/powerpoint-custom-animation-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-1919</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivia Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingaboutpresenting.com/?p=3152#comment-1919</guid>
		<description>Hi Nathan
Yes, it seems a simple thing, but you spend a couple of seconds wondering about the different colors - and meanwhile you&#039;ve lost what the presenter said. Olivia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nathan<br />
Yes, it seems a simple thing, but you spend a couple of seconds wondering about the different colors &#8211; and meanwhile you&#8217;ve lost what the presenter said. Olivia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivia Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/design/powerpoint-custom-animation-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-1918</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivia Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingaboutpresenting.com/?p=3152#comment-1918</guid>
		<description>Hi ITIL expert
The researchers did speculate that one of the reasons the non-animated version was more effective was because of the longer exposure time. I think your suggestion is an excellent one. Olivia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ITIL expert<br />
The researchers did speculate that one of the reasons the non-animated version was more effective was because of the longer exposure time. I think your suggestion is an excellent one. Olivia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

